
In the "My Philadelphia" contest, students from Philadelphia shared their visions of the city. Check out the winning entries.

In the "My Philadelphia" contest, students from Philadelphia shared their visions of the city. Check out the winning entries.
Nov. 25, 2007
Is it any wonder people complain about Philadelphia city services? Just look at the trends.
To pay for soaring costs in a few budget areas, the city has whittled staff and services in many other departments: from recreation to streets to revenue to procurement.
It is called robbing Peter to pay Paul, if you’ll excuse the cliché.
Actually, it may be robbing Peter to jail Paul, because the bulging city prisons are one of the biggest rising costs.
In terms of (inflation adjusted) dollars and employees, every category of city services – except public safety and social services – has gone down in the last five years.
Add to this another concern: The city has been neglecting its infrastructure. Sounds boring, sure – unless your recreation center roof leaks or your health center bathroom won’t work. Then you feel it. As you do when you hit a pothole or cross a crumbling bridge.
Usually this work is paid through the sale of long-term bonds. Why not pay for it over 20 years if it is going to last 20 years or more? But the city admits its capital spending falls far short of what’s needed to maintain infrastructure properly – about two-thirds short.
It’s not that the city isn’t selling bonds. It is. But, a lot of that debt has gone to finance pet projects, from stadiums to Mayor Street’s Neighborhood Transformation Initiative and his cultural program.
In short, the city can perform the basics, but it has stripped itself of the capacity to do more.
The other piece of the problem has to do with attitude. The city bureaucracy rarely treats taxpayers as customers who deserve service simply because they pay the bills. It responds to clout, to pressure, to agitation – not to an ideal of service. So citizens have to know whom to call, or to beg someone with juice to do it for them.
City Council members do more to perpetuate this syndrome than to fix it. In fact, they (their staffs, really) function as the chief go-betweens whose phone calls rouse the bureaucracy to act. That’s how the pols collect chits from voters, which they cash in at election time. It’s a lousy system, but it’s deeply embedded, producing levels of service and cynicism that no city intent on greatness can tolerate.
Here’s how to fix it:
Someone to watch over me:
Create an independent, taxpayer-paid ombudsman to investigate complaints about service failures or the performance of city employees. Rather than begging favors from Council members, some civic leaders said they’d much rather have such a person whose job it is to help them, with no quid pro quos.
YouTube to the rescue:
Create a Web site where citizens can post video documenting problems, from trash-strewn lots to abandoned cars to dangerous buildings to lollygagging workers. Each video would come with a counter tracking the days until the city responds.
(Illustration by Tim Ogline)